GG

GG
Follow my Twitter : @lovbie_df

Selasa, 27 September 2016

STRUCTURE OF MODIFICATION








Members of Group 2 TBI 5-B :
  1. Bikry Faridatur Rofiqoh            (1723143025)
  2. Nurul Laila Farid                      (1723143137)
  3. Ulfa Nur Qori                           (1723143174)
  4. Via Giarola Sari                        (1723143178)

STRUCTURE OF MODIFICATION
(Noun as a Head)
  1. STRUCTURE OF MODIFICATION
The relationship of modification is fundamental in Syntax. There are two components which are named head and modifier. Head is the word that has a role as the core of the phrase. Modifier is the component that describes, or modifies the head of the phrase.
  1. NOUN AS A HEAD
Noun can be found as head of structure of modification very frequently. The modifier of noun can be an adjective or another noun. There are 5 part of speech to modify the noun.
1.         Adjective as Noun Modifier
Adjective are expressions that used to modify a noun. However, not all adjectives can modify nouns, because some adjectives have a function as a predicate. Adjective precedes the noun they modify. Example :
Modifier                       Head
The gloomy                  room
Fried                            chicken
His cheerful                  smile
If the adjective is not a single word, the adjective may come after the noun. Example :
Head                            Modifier
A figure                        vague and shadowy
A man                          taller than I thought
2.         Noun as Noun Modifier
Noun modifier also precedes the head. The modifier can be possessive form or basic form.
Possessive                    Noun
The woman’s                friend
Child’s                         play
A day’s                        work
Basic form or noun-adjunct is noun that has a function like an adjective (to modify noun). It is always singular form. Example :
Basic Form                   Noun
Child                            psychology
The day                        shift
A father                        image
Noun as noun modifier can be from appositive words. The position is preceding the head. Appositive form never follows the head. Example :
Noun                Appositive
Mr. Brow         the art critic      (praised the painting)
The children      both boys and girls        (receive presents)

3.         Verb as Noun Modifier
It can be present participle (V-ing), past participle (V-ed), or to-infinitive. The verb may precedes the head. It follows the head if it is a part of larger structures. For exception, to-infinitive always follow the noun (head). Example :
Verb                Noun
Running            water
Baked              potatoes
                                                Noun                Verb
                                                Water               running in the street
                                                Potatoes           baked slowly
                                                Money             to buy
                                                The man           to see

4.         Adverb as Noun Modifier
Adverb is rarely used as noun modifier.  It comes after noun they modify. Example :
Head                Modifier
Indonesia          now
The people       there
5.         Prepositional Phrase
Prepositional phrase follow the head which they modify. The preposition can be in a simple, compound, or phrasal form.
-       Simple preposition
Example :
Single preposition
After                 from                 on                    though
As                    in                      out                   till
At                     like                   over                 to
Two morphemes
About               around              between           toward
Above              before              beyond             underneath
Across              behind              despite             unlike
-       Compound Preposition
Example :
Across from                  down from                    together with
Along with                    upon                             onto
Apart from                    inside of                        instead of
-       Phrasal Prepositions
Example :
In regard to                  
in front of                     
in addition to


REFERENCES
Francise, W.N. 1958. Structure of American English. New York: The Ronald Press  Company.
Jong-Bok, Kim and Peter Sells. 2007. English Syntax: an Introduction. Center for Study of Language and Information.
Krohn, Robert. 1986. English Sentence Structure. USA: The University of Michigan Press.
Miller, Jim. 2002. An Introduction to English Syntax. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Ltd.

Verspoor, Marjolijn and Kim Sauter. 2002. English Sentence Analysis: an Introductory Course. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

EXPLORING INSERVICE TEACHER EDUCATION IN KOREA


SUMMARY
EXPLORING INSERVICE TEACHER EDUCATION IN KOREA
Arranged to fulfill the Assignment of
English Language Teaching in Asia
Lecturer:
Luluk Anjarwati, M.Pd.


                                                  Member of 3rd Group :        
Bikry Faridatur Rofiqoh            (1723143025)
Zuliana Setyoningrum                (1723143194)
Solikha Safira Ahmad               (1723143168)
Sabila Rohmatul Latifah            (1723143157)
Pawestri                                   (1723143142)

ENGLISH EDUCATION DEPARTMENT 5-B
FACULTY OF EDUCATION AND TEACHER TRAINING
STATE ISLAMIC INSTITUTE (IAIN)
OF TULUNGAGUNG
SEPTEMBER 2016









EXPLORING INSERVICE TEACHER EDUCATION
IN KOREA
A.       BACKGROUND
Education is an important cultural element in most Asian countries, as in Korea. Korean students get the high rank in mathematics, reading, and problem-solving, but they have low rank in English proficiency. From 2004 to 2005, Korea ranked 93rd among 147 nations. In 2007, Korea ranked 134th  in the speaking section.
Among many challenges and issues of English education in Korea, the teacher factor plays a key role in making English education more effective. In the language classroom, the teacher is being a centre more than in any other subject.  
B.       TEACHER IN CLASSROOM
1.    Influence of Teach
The classroom has been traditionally teacher-centered, with teachers controlling the subject discussed in the classroom and dominating the talking time. In the language classroom specifically, the teacher seems to play a more important role than in the classes of any other subject and this is related with the teacher’s roles as the living source of the target language. A language teacher is an influential component in the classroom because the teacher is the dominant talking and traditional teacher-centered role in classes can influence the classroom  learning environment.
2.    Approaches to Effective Language Teaching
Some approaches that are used in English Language Teaching in Korea:
a.    The Grammar Translation Method
The grammar translation method focuses on the study of grammar and the application of grammar rules while translating passages from one language to another. In this method, detailed explanations of grammar are given to the students with reading selections, which usually consist of a list of translated new vocabulary.
b.    The Direct Approach
The direct approach is the main method in the ‘English village’ concept in Korea. ‘English village’ in Korea were started as an alternative for the growing number of Korean student who were going to English speaking countries to study English.
c.    Comprehension Based Approach
Comprehension based approaches prioritise receptive skills (listening and reading) over productive skills (speaking and writing).[1] This method was developed by Asher in 1974 who believed that most grammar and vocabulary could be though through the use of language in its vital form used by the teacher. The use of this method in Korea is evident in English villages where the teacher teach students during cooking lesson, drama and music, science and invention, art culture and entertainment, homeroom and action time.
d.    Communicative Approach
The communicative approach views language as a social value where the learner wants to be able to communicate in the target language and will work in small group to inform each other in the target language as they have communicative purposes.
C.       TEACHER EDUCATION
Classroom is a place where interactions are appearing, the teacher plays an crucial role in the socially complex environment. Therefore, training teacher is also important in the language classroom.
1.    Two Key Concepts
The two key components consisting of educating English teacher are “content” and “process”, while content is a subject matter knowledge, skills or technique obtained in the teacher education institution. The majority of research done in Korea has been concerned with content that is, subject matter knowledge, characteristic of good English teacher.
2.    Current Model of Teacher Education
Wallace suggested that there are currently three major models of professional education : the craft model, the applied science model, and the reflective model.[2]
The craft model
     This model was a traditional and basically a model of showing and telling.
The Applied Science Model
     This model develops its authority from the achievement of empirical science.
The Reflective Model
     The first kind, received knowledge, consists of facts, data and theories, often related to some kind of scientific research. The second kind, experiential knowledge: “Knowing-in-action”.
Since the Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) approach was introduced, great attention has been focused on the question of hiring native English-speaking teachers and communicative competence became a focus. The significance of learning and teaching English has been emphasized because it enables relationship and communication with people all over the world.[3] The purpose is to help the development of students’ English speaking proficiency, English communication ability, improving cultural awareness, develop the English text books and some materials, and improving English teaching methodologies. Before hiring the teachers, the teacher education and the needs should be observed.
The needs of in-service teacher education strongly proposed at the beginning of the 1980s.[4] There are some needs of in-service education, the first is how to expose to the new and specialized knowledge, attitude, and even technology. The second is the needs of competence in leadership and management. The third is the ability of problem-solving, which can be used to solve the problems of social issues.
D.      TEACHER EDUCATION IN KOREA
1.      History of Teacher Education
The first national teacher education institution in Korea was Hansung Normal School, established at Seoul in 1895. The students were trained for four to five years to be primary school teachers. The institution as the secondary level lasted until 1945 when the Japanese colonial rule ended.
In 1946 after Korea was liberated, the Korean Education Council finally applied the system of ‘normal school’ for the training of primary school teacher, and ‘college of education’ for the training of secondary school teacher. Many intelligent students applied for colleges of education in high competition. The first three institutions for secondary teacher education were Seoul College of Education, Daegu College of Education, and Gongju College of Education.[5]
In 1985, Korean government founded the Korea University of Education which was seen as the future development of teacher education. The specific goal of the Korea National University of Education is in-service training of teachers at all school and develops the programs for retraining, and seeking the development of teaching competence and professionalism.
2.      Challenges of Teacher Education
Choi, Chung, and Chung stated that there have been challenges regarding teacher education: no consistent effort on change, no concrete strategy of quality control for teacher education institutions, and no proper teacher training based on reflective teaching.[6] Chung also discussed some issues about the systematic way of developing teacher education in Korea. Firstly, systematic teacher training should be focused on the most up to date and effective system. Secondly, it should reflect on practical knowledge beyond academic knowledge, giving a rise in deep thinking. Thirdly, Chung also mentioned that, as the new system of new teacher education institutions are developing, it should focus on how good teachers.
Beside those challenges, there are some problems in teaching education. Teacher education has crucial challenges. One of those is deficiency of studies. It makes the teacher must be able to perform various studies, even it may not use in teaching practice. The conflict between communicative focus and exam-oriented education also become a problem.
3.      New Policy of Teacher Education
In 1986, some policies are established for improving the system of teacher education. The policies are about recruitment methods, selection methods, exemption the tuition, the service of teaching profession after graduation, improvement of management effectiveness of curriculum, graduation and certification system, certification and employment system. About the English teacher, just one native speaker English teacher per school. English teacher can apply with some qualifications. The first is hold a minimum of degree from an accredited university. The second qualification is being a citizen from country which has English as its official language. The teacher must be fluent and proficient in English grammar and structure, and be able to communicate fluently. Teacher must have the ability and willingness to adapt to Korean culture. The last qualification is meet the criteria of eligibility for work visa.
Entrance examination contents in Korea are same, except for the practical skill in colleges of arts and physical education. Potential students of education colleges are selected by scholastic achievement. A comprehensive selection system was development in the beginning of the 1980s to select the qualified students. A recommendation letter from the principal can strengthen the students to be selected. Most teachers who apply for primary school are educated in teacher’s colleges. Although the school has a good election system, but the school have bad system to divide the period for each subjects. It makes the teacher feels disappointed because the material that is conveyed doesn’t meet the maximum result.
Standard of teacher applicant for secondary school is emphasized in the scholastic achievements. Graduates of education of colleges are not given certificates when they finish their study, but they must take pedagogical courses. They have to get at least ‘B’ grade in major subjects and teaching profession subjects to be certified. Not only as a secondary school teacher, the teacher can teach the students of private education. It is because English needs to be taught for highest score at the secondary school level. That is why so many Korean students take private English lesson.
The Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEST) set up in 2007 the plan to implement ‘The Reform of Teachers Policy’ which is composed some items among the following areas: pre-service teacher education, in-service teacher education, promotion, and appointment of principals. With respect to English education, it is notable that MEST decided to build the system of Teaching English through English (TETE). However, it found that English teachers are under motivated to use English and are also not capable of using English in class.
MEST now feels the necessity to expand the TETE hours for students to be exposed much more to English. To make this happen, MEST has made four strategies with regard to English teachers: intensifying English teacher training, recruiting English Specialty Instructors, systematic screening and management of English native speaking teachers, and the task of ‘Teach and Learn in Korea’.[7]
E.       PRE-SERVICE TRAINING VS. IN-SERVICE TRAINING
The knowledge and experience are the main point of education for beginner teacher. The teacher needs training programs for their experienced. In-service teacher education is the study that focusing on training experienced teachers.  It is use in a given situation with some techniques and to engage teachers in process of critical thinking upon their current teaching beliefs and practices. Whereas the breadth and opportunity of the various disciplines which become teacher background knowledge is pre-service training. It is use to develop their skills with enough knowledge.
1.    In-service Training in Korea
There are two kinds In-service Training in Korea, that is Training for Certificate and Training for Teacher development.
a.       Training for Certificate
This training is generally targeted at improving culture of teacher either that improving practical skills. This certificate takes about 180-200 hours of study and it is usually offered during vacation time.
b.      Training for Teacher development
This training is targeted at improving various specific techniques specialties, such as speaking  ability, developing multimedia and developing material. This training ranges from 15-120 hours during semesters and vacation.
2.    Challenges of In-service Training in Korea
Teachers training program in Korea is not satisfactory so the practical is unsuccessful, except the Intensive English Teacher Training Program (IETTP). Beside that, the government does not spend enough money on teacher education. Teachers are following this training only to improve their job.
3.    Steps for Better In-service Teacher Education
There are four effective in-services teacher education, those are:
a.    Field-centeredness
Teacher education curriculum should focus on the teaching field. Both pre-service and in-service training should reflect on what going on in the field.
b.    Networking
Networking between teacher and teacher, and between school and school is having various learning effects on teachers through shared curriculum and stimulation. This networking makes possible reflection about activities in class.
c.    Continuity
To be a competent teacher, one-time training is not enough, it is comprehensively accomplished throughout one’s whole life.
d.    Reflective Teaching
The action of thinking deeply or carefully about something and a process that involves looking back and re-creating thoughts upon teaching is Reflective teaching. In other words, awareness of and analyzing what one has done or what one is doing in relation to teaching also reflective teaching certainly has critical perspective on his/her teaching.
F.        REFLECTIVE TEACHING IN KOREA
Chang conducted an investigation with a group of foreign language teachers during a two-week teacher training course. She suggested that diaries can be used as valuable tool in encouraging the language teachers to reflect on language learning and teaching processes as a part of a teacher training course.[8]
1.    Challenges of reflective teaching
The questionnaire focused on how they felt about teacher development including reflective teaching. The practical ways of approaching teacher development into four groups: Individual-Observing, Individual-Doing, Collaborative-Observing, Collaborative-Doing. The result of Lee’s study showed three outcomes. Firstly, teachers preferred individual activities to collaborative ones to promote professional development. Secondly, an influence of professional development activities was noticed in the changes concerning methodology perception and attitudes, but not in actual teaching. Lastly, secondary school teachers regarded the washback effect of tests, administrative management, and school culture unfavorable to professional peer collaboration as major factors inhibiting professional development. Recognizing the need of teacher development and method sharing among teachers are necessary to consider first in reflective teaching.
The reasons that prevent teachers from being actively involved in reflective teaching, firstly, the teachers are so intently focused on entrance exam to the next level, that it is difficult for them to find the time for teacher development. Almost of teachers in the study think that administrative management and chores are a huge difficulty to teacher development in Korea.
G.      CONCLUSION
Great effort has been made concerning English education in Korea over the past fifty years. However, the results are not as successful as they might be expected. As a teacher is important, teacher training is also important in the language education. Teacher education in Korea has been neither effective nor practical. There are several reasons for this. Firstly, the training tends to be concerned with the theory rather than practice. Secondly, the training programs, which are usually conservative, have not caught up with the rapidly-changing world. Thirdly, the government does not invest as much money into teacher education as it needs to. Lastly, even though the purpose of in-service teacher education is to participate teachers in a process of critical thinking on their current teaching beliefs and practices, teachers seem to be losing their identity and are not motivated for teacher development.
More surprising is that the majority of teachers in the study are not likely to collaborate with colleague teachers. Also, teachers often do not have time to concentrate on teaching with reflection as they do not think they are involved in effective time management at school. The situations in the educational context of Korea should be flexible in helping teachers to be involved in reflective teaching practice.


References
Gavran, Sunny. 2013. The Importance of English Language Learning and Teaching in South Korea. Thesis. Victoria University.
Taeyoung, Kim. 2014. Differences in Demotivation Between Chinese and Korean English Teachers: A Mixed Methods Study. The Asia-Pasific Education Researcher. Chung-Ang University.
The Asian Association of Teachers of English as a Foreign Language. 2009. English Language Teacher Education in Asia. Seoul: eduKCL.
Unesco. 1990. Innovations and Initiative In Teacher Education In Asia and The Pacific Region. Bangkok: Unesco Principal Regional Office for Asia and The Pacific.




[1] Sunny Gavran, “The Importance of English Language Learning and Teaching in South Korea”, thesis, Victoria University, 2013, page 34.
[2] The Asian Association of Teachers of English as a Foreign Language, English Language Teacher Education in Asia, (Seoul: eduKCL, 2009), page 53.
[3] Taeyoung, Kim, “Differences in Demotivation Between Chinese and Korean English Teachers: A Mixed Methods Study”,  The Asia-Pasific Education Researcher, Chung-Ang University, (2014), page 6.
[4] Unesco, Innovations and Initiative In Teacher Education In Asia and The Pacific Region, (Bangkok: Unesco Principal Regional Office for Asia and The Pacific, 1990), page 58.
[5] The Asian Association of Teachers of English as a Foreign Language, English Language Teacher Education in Asia, (Seoul: eduKCL, 2009), page 55.
[6] The Asian Association of Teachers of English as a Foreign Language, English Language Teacher Education in Asia, (Seoul: eduKCL, 2009), page 56.
[7] The Asian Association of Teachers of English as a Foreign Language, English Language Teacher Education in Asia, (Seoul: eduKCL, 2009), page 57.
[8] The Asian Association of Teachers of English as a Foreign Language, English Language Teacher Education in Asia, (Seoul: eduKCL, 2009), page 62.